Competition in the Dog Training World: Is It Necessary?

Photo: © CanStock Photo

Does the dog training community need to become more cooperative and collaborative? © CanStock Photo

By Joanne Ometz

I am a graduate of Turid Rugaas’ first US offering of her dog behavior counselor/trainer certification course. Most people in the US know Rugaas for her book, On Talking Terms with Dogs, and the study of canine body language is a big part of what I learned. But what is not well known is that she has a full curriculum that she has taught in Europe for many years. Before that, I was the organizer and de-facto teacher for a local dog club where the focus was on fun, and learning skills to enhance our relationships with our dogs. My former professional education was as a social worker.

I am by nature a collaborator and not the most competitive person, and the dog training world took me somewhat by surprise. I expected to find a collegial atmosphere, with trainers sharing their techniques and referring clients to each other. Instead, I have found a surprising amount of competition, which I am finding it a little difficult to understand.

Social workers and other mental health professionals who are in private practice routinely refer clients to each other. This may be because of a lack of space in their schedule, or because they know a colleague specializes in something they do not. Or it may simply be because they, or the client, believe a colleague would be a better fit.

I have not seen this so much in the dog training world. For instance, often, if we work for another trainer or a facility, we sign a ‘no-compete’ agreement. As such, I have heard of one trainer who put up fliers several days short of the no-compete contract’s full year who was ordered to take them down by his former employer.

Are we that threatened by each other, or that unsure of our own abilities that we are unable to welcome more great trainers in to the fold? Are there so few people who own dogs that we have to guard our resources so aggressively? How much do we miss out on by behaving this way? And how much could we benefit by becoming more cooperative, more of a community?

This is not just a theme in the world of dog trainers. There is a phrase, “It’s a dog eat dog world.” But we now know how cooperative dogs are in their dealings with each other. Sometimes I wonder if ‘dominance theory’ has more to do with humans than dogs!

There are oases in this emotional desert but they are few and far between. There are many workshops, books and journal articles on how to compete more effectively against each other. But it is less common to come across education that deals with how best to collaborate and work together for our common goals (although this is something PPG is working to change). And so often, generosity and cooperation, just like competition and aggression, breed more of the same. These values take effort and awareness in order to instill them in ourselves and in our relationships. We work to improve the lives of animals that love and support us more than any other. Can we not learn from them how to relate more peacefully with our own kind?

 Joanne Ometz is a dog behavior counselor/trainer located in Asheville, NC. When not working with clients or volunteering at the Asheville Humane Society, she spends time with her Aussie puppy Frida, mixed breed Sadie, Queen Lorraine the cat, and various human friends. She can be reached via her website.

 

 

 

This entry was posted in Business Development, Consulting, Personal Development and tagged , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Competition in the Dog Training World: Is It Necessary?

  1. Amanda Newell says:

    An excellent article. I believe the only species fixated with dominance is humanity and we are actually projecting ourselves onto dogs and other animals when we talk obsessively about it in them! I’ve sadly walked away from training and behaviour work for this very reason – I’ve been deeply shocked by the unpleasantness that often occurs between trainers and the ‘my way is the only way’ attitude. I’m so glad someone else is addressing these issues – we should be working in empathy and collaboration for the good of dogs and other animals not in competitive animosity!

  2. I do see some of this but, equally, see a lot of cooperation amongst my network. Personally, I often have new or aspiring trainers attend my classes to watch and learn what I do. These may go on to be trainers local to me. My attitude is, if they’re any good, they will be someone else I can refer on to for whatever reason, if they’re not good, they’ll disappear fairly quickly. Maybe the difference with your example of social work is that those people get their salary even if they refer on, whereas most dog trainers are self-employed, so referring on potentially equates to loss of income, at least in the short term.

  3. xsbarkng1@yahoo.com' Lynn says:

    Joanne, Well spoken. how I would love to get together with the trainers in my area to chat about what is going on and how we can work together on projects. My only question and the problem that keeps them from recommending others to me is that I am a clicker trainer and they are not. To be fair it is the same reason I hesitate to recommend people to them. Prong collars all over the place. Some use clickers half of the time corrections the other half. I don’t feel like I have to compete with them, but I do feel unaccepted by them. How can I work on building comradery when there is such a gap between our basic approach to training? Honest question, not a defeated attitude statement.

  4. Niki@petprofessionalguild.com' Niki Tudge says:

    There is enough room in the market place for all of us, we should be working together to benefit the pets and to spread our message

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>