Ad Hoc Advocacy

Advocacy opportunities sometimes pop up unexpectedly, as happened to me in November 2016.

I contribute a column to a local weekly newspaper and while perusing an issue I found an interview with the public works director of a nearby village. He casually mentioned spraying herbicide in the dog park to control thistles.

The director responded to my email inquiry and identified a specific 2,4-D product in use, inviting me to attend a meeting of the Park Board in two weeks. Knowing nothing about 2,4-D I did a little research and was amazed it was one of two main components of Agent Orange.

U.S. Army Operations in Vietnam R.W. Trewyn, Ph.D. , (11) Huey Defoliation National Archives: 111-CC-59948

U.S. Army Operations in Vietnam R.W. Trewyn, Ph.D. , (11) Huey Defoliation National Archives: 111-CC-59948

That defoliant was used during the Vietnam war and is responsible for generations of Vietnamese suffering birth defects and the death of many American soldiers who were contaminated. Included among them is my friend, Larry, who was one of the first veterans granted recognition of disease caused by Agent Orange.

I wondered whether it was safe to use 2,4-D in municipal parks and found there were over 3,000 sources in scientific literature on the chemical, spanning seven decades.
My goal was to inform the Park Board of risks using a 2,4-D product and what alternatives were available. I printed fact sheets for each board member and attended the meeting.

Gladly I heard several sincere expressions of concern about public safety and welfare in the parks, and was equally alarmed to hear the public works director say 2,4-D was to be used in other parks where children played. A sandbox with thistles was one specific target.

Based on what I read, the chemical has been identified as an endocrine disruptor affecting human reproductive systems, is linked to cancers and can easily contaminate water. Should it be sprayed in a sandbox where children play or on grass where dogs and families recreate?

Daniel H. Antolec/Happy Buddha Dog Training

Daniel H. Antolec/Happy Buddha Dog Training

I read the product label of the particular herbicide used by the village and it was identified by the manufacturer as a corrosive that may cause irreversible eye damage and may be fatal if swallowed. The manufacture warned “Do not apply directly to water or to areas where surface water is present”.

The dog park is on moist peat about 40 feet from a creek and a bit further away from a water treatment plant. The soil retains water and is easily flooded. One complaint about the park is that foot traffic turns the surface to mud. Summer winds usually blow from the south and the water features are to the north, raising the risk of contamination.

I emailed the manufacturer asking how soon after spraying was it “safe” for children and pets to play on the turf. The response was “As soon as the surface is dry”.

Hmmm? If I sprayed my lawn on a hot sunny day and it dried an hour later I could send my kids and dogs onto the lawn…knowing children engage in hand-to-mouth behavior and dogs eat grass? No thank you.

Independent data declared “2,4-D…are highly volatile and will drift by wind to other fields. Production and use of 2,4-D and other chlorinated pesticides has been associated with considerable environmental contaminations with dioxins and furans.”

“Tetrachloridibenzop-dioxin is known to be a human carcinogen based on sufficient evidence of carcinogenicity from studies in humans, both epidemiological and on the mechanism of carcinogenesis. It is also a potent endocrine disruptor with significant effects on reproduction.”

“…under sunlight traces of dioxin contained in pesticide formulation may multiply.” (1)

Another source declared “There’s a growing body of scientific evidence that the chemical poses a danger to both human health and the environment.”

“Researchers have observed apparent links between exposure to 2,4-D and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (a blood cancer) and sarcoma (a soft tissue cancer.)”

“…in 2015, the International Agency for Research on Cancer declared 2,4-D a possible human carcinogen, based on evidence that it damages human cells and, in a number of studies, caused cancer in laboratory animals.”

“More conclusive is the proof that 2,4-D falls into a class of compounds called endocrine-disrupting chemicals, compounds that mimic or inhibit the body’s hormones.”

“Also problematic, 2,4-D sticks around in the environment. Depending on the formulation, it can drift through the air from fields where it is sprayed or be tracked inside homes by pets or children. By the EPA’s own measure, 2,4-D has already been detected in groundwater and surface water, as well as in drinking water.”

“It can also poison small mammals, including dogs who can ingest it after eating grass treated with 2,4-D.” (2)

I ended my presentation with information about less-toxic alternatives to thistle control such as picking, mowing, vinegar-based herbicides, insect and animal control.

The Park Board suspended herbicide spraying in all village parks while they conduct additional research into less toxic methods of weed control. The dog park was chosen as a pilot project.

The public works director agreed to accept direction from the Board but stated “People don’t want weeds in parks” to which a member replied “They don’t want cancer either. We can find safer alternatives.”

 

Clker.com

Clker.com

Following that meeting a board member who stopped using herbicides 15 years ago informed me “We had no idea this chemical was being used.” She lives in the country and lets her goats eat the weeds in her horse paddock.

One week later in the same village I approached a Neighborhood Association which dictates the use of lawn chemicals to all residents in their domain, including a client who has a dog.  That client will bear a child next spring.  The Neighborhood Association agreed to meet and discuss the information I provided them.

We may inform and educate others in ways that we never expected, keeping people and their pets safe.  Advocacy rocks!

(1) “The risks of the herbicide 2,4-D” by Lars Neumeister, independent pesticide expert. January 2014.
(2) National Resources Defense Council article, “2,4-D: The Most Dangerous Pesticide You’ve Never Heard Of”. March 15,2016.

Daniel H. Antolec is the owner of Happy Buddha Dog Training in Wisconsin (USA) and is a Project Trade participant, and humble chair of the PPG Advocacy Committee. His adopted Labradors, Buddha and Gandhi, are Pet Partners therapy dogs.

About Daniel Antolec

Daniel H. Antolec, PCT-A, CBCC-KA, CPDT-KA completed a 30-year police career which included several years as an instructor of two tactical fields. In 2007 he took a job in a dog daycare and began studying canine behavior and training, which led to credentialing as a professional trainer and behavior consultant. In 2012 Antolec founded Happy Buddha Dog Training. His Labradors (Buddha and Gandhi) are registered Pet Partners therapy dogs.
This entry was posted in Advocacy, Pet Care, Stuff, Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

7 Responses to Ad Hoc Advocacy

  1. Great post! I know, right? It’s just terrible that almost all parks spray with some sort of pesticide. Not to mention they don’t even put out the little flags telling people they sprayed. I often wonder how many parents aren’t even aware of this as their child crawls on the ground then puts their hands in their mouths. It’s a pretty disgusting practice.

    • Hi Tonya! I was shocked one day when I entered a neighborhood in the village to work with a (pregnant) client and every single yard as far as the eye could see was flagged for toxic herbicide application…yet there were children and dogs playing on those yards. Then I learned the dog park was being sprayed, and worse. I was very impressed with the genuine good stewardship of the Park Board. The members were very attentive, asked smart questions and chose to select caution and safety as they considered what to do in the spring. It was inspiring to see (local) government working effectively for the benefit of citizens.

  2. Advocacy rocks…and so do YOU! I don’t even live in your community, but I would like to thank you for what you did. Educating people is what it’s all about and I appreciate that you took the time to do that for your neighbors, their children and their dogs. :-)

    • Hi Tiffany, and thank you. I made an impression on the Park Board, considering I live outside the village and do not take my dogs to the park. It would have been easy to ignore the whole matter, but it would not have been easy on my conscience. It is remarkable what little effort on our part can have such direct beneficial influence on others. Then again, that is how I see PPG. We individually come together under the umbrella of an international organization whose sole purpose is to inform and educate others, and thus our collective voices reach around the world. PPG rocks, and so to it’s members. Thanks for supporting PPG, Tiffany!

  3. jblue@wi.rr.com' Jan Blue says:

    Great article! Thank you Daniel.

    • Thank you Jan. I hope this inspires others to consider how they may find advocacy opportunities in their communities. I offer in-home services in many communities and in 2017 I will be discussing pet safety and lawn chemicals with clients. It may give them information about their own lawn care, how to approach their local park boards on this subject, and how to inform neighborhood associations that may be dictating lawn care practices. I suspect many folks just do not know the risks and rely upon product marketing for their information. (Remember what the tobacco industry did for decades…)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>